fig vs warp terminal (2026): a stub-mode comparison
This is a stub-mode Drafter output for "fig vs warp terminal". The shape is real; the prose is filler so the orchestration can be verified end to end without spending on the model.
At a glance
| Option A | Option B | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Filler A | Filler B |
| Pricing | Filler | Filler |
| Best for | Filler | Filler |
| Trial | 14 days | 14 days |
When Option A wins
Stub body. Replace with live mode for real prose. This section exists so the renderer has something to lay out and the qa-score formula has the right number of body sections to credit.
When Option B wins
Stub body. Replace with live mode for real prose. This second body section exists so the comparison layout shows the same shape it did in the Phase 2 hand-seeded page.
FAQ
- Is this a real draft?
- No — this is the stub Drafter for plumbing tests.
- How do I get a real draft?
- Set DRAFTER_MODE=live and configure OPENAI_API_KEY.
- Will the renderer accept this?
- Yes — the section shape matches the Phase 2 contract.
Ready to choose?
This CTA is a placeholder; swap in your real call-to-action when the live prompt is ready.